| NPN wrote: |
I spent the opening, and following weekend at Whiteface then came down to Gore last weekend.
You all are not only right about Gore being behind, but after just coming back from an almost entirely open Whiteface, you should be flat out livid with how far behind Gore is.
Supposedly, you have the same compressor capacity, and gun count as Whiteface. They're controlled by the same management group, so what's the problem.
Wish I had an answer for you, but I do sympathize.
You'd think after the nightmare that was last Xmas/Holiday week they'd be taking advantage of the perfect snowmaking temps to recoup some of the lost revenue, and have the joint pristine. |
I think the phrase here is "be careful what you wish for, or you just might get it."
What I mean is that Gore's operations have always been inconsistenet and this inconsistency has made some people decide they would prefer to visit a more professionally run mountain (not Gore). So, for better or worse, this inconsistency in operations keeps the mountain at a competitive disadvantage vs. Vermont resorts.
But, the way I see it, a 2nd class mountain keeps prices and crowds lower. Pick your poison: better quality and higher prices/crowds or vice versa. I'm sure we would all complain if it was more expensive and more crowded even though Gore had better amenitites and more consistenet quality of operations.
$0.02
(I find myself saying that Gore "almost got it right" a lot of the time as well.)