View Poll Results: Will we see Boundary to Boundary skiing at Gore in this lifetime?

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Uh, no. Not with the APA around...

    10 52.63%
  • You bet! If you can see it, you can ski it!

    1 5.26%
  • What, we don't have that now? Nobody told me...

    8 42.11%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Poll: Boundary to Boundary?

    I know lift layout is an issue/risk with boundary to boundary skiing at Gore--but will we ever actually see it? It works well at other Eastern mountains....

  2. #2
    Do you mean full lift service with no skinning or climbing?

    I don't think a lift will ever be put up the flank of Pete Gay.

    I think there is a limit on the amount of trail that Gore can have. Not sure how much is left.

  3. #3
    I thought a B-B policy was more like green lighting the woods, any woods. Kinda like Jay's policy...

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Harvey44
    I think there is a limit on the amount of trail that Gore can have. Not sure how much is left.
    I recently read an online article (that I can't find anymore) that Whiteface is within 2 miles of their 25-mile limit and that Gore has more than 10 miles left on their 40-mile limit.

    The article also said that Gore is up in skier visits this year, while Whiteface is down, and that ORDA is quite in the red. That might explain a lot about what isn't open during the week.
    The sea was angry that day my friends, like an old man trying to send back soup at a deli

  5. #5
    What other Eastern resorts allow b-to-b skiing and what are the specific policies? Obviously MRG, and I've stated previously that I thought a woods policy similar to MRG's wuould be appropriate at Gore. But how do other Eastern resort areas administer an open woods policy?

  6. #6
    don't some of them or their states have a policy that if you're " out there " and need rescued you may get billed ?
    incoming .................DUCK !

  7. #7
    I don't really see why it matters weather they are or not. You can still ski it with minimal risk of being "caught" and even if you are I don't think the penalty would be anything to worry about. Who, that cares is going to see and report you on the backside of the mtn, or on pete gay ect...

    As for the rescue, if it is needed you were not prepared/using the right BC techniques ie- skiing w. buddy. So of course you should be billed for the rescue efforts.

    Don't ask questions you don't want the answers to
    Listen to the wind, It'll tell you things

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    222
    I think it would be an insurance thing.....

    You can accept your own liability all you want.....until you are hurt...then your family/friends or even injured you decide to file suit. B-B will never occur.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    East shore, schroon lake.
    Posts
    131
    lol, who cares if you get billed to be rescued?

    die, or get billed?

    i'll take the bill.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by MidnightCarving
    lol, who cares if you get billed to be rescued?

    die, or get billed?

    i'll take the bill.
    you assumed incorrectly! i think it's a great idea. when people go out of bounds and then need rescued they create unnecessary hardships, risks and expenses for others.

    so there! lol
    incoming .................DUCK !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Ski Gear | Snowboard Gear | Cycling Gear | Camping/Hiking Gear | Ski & Snowboard Racks | Gear Outlet | Men's Clothing | Women's Clothing | Kids' Clothing

Sugarbush / Mad River Glen Message Boards | Ski Vermont