well, no input? it's makes me curiuos when things don't add up, as listed above. here's a link that shows that Gore gets improvement money as GRANTS - not loans. this is a huge advantage over privately run ski areas. Gore/Face should not operate in the red. with grants to pay for improvemnets, and the many other reasons i listed above, i also question if/why they would need yearly State money for their budgets. think how well off you'ld be if you didn't pay taxes or mortgage costs, got large discounts on purchases and received grants to make improvements.Originally Posted by Snowballs
not bashing. just pointing out a large anomoly that directly effects us.
http://www.poststar.com/articles/200...cal/247458.txt
and here's yet another refutation of " someone " on here who refuses to acknowledge obvious truths even when confronted with hard evidence.
http://www.poststar.com/articles/200...ocal/29587.txt http://www.poststar.com/articles/200...ters/30723.txt
in these articles you'll see others- some public officials- pointing out inequities between Face and Gore, ala preferentail treat for Face. this is how it will remain. i'm not sure it even bothers me-so far. i'm just keeping it real..... x10003q was right.
i did think it interesting that Pratt chose the "no comment" route. he coulda tried to deny it.